We initially thought the trip was going to be a bust in as the first two hours of fishing did not yield a single bite. The hour prior to high tide, however, yielded a good deal of action and we landed a total of 11 mackerel and two small pollock. The 4 largest mackerel were in the 12-13-inch range, which is larger than typical.

My wife caught the three largest of the above mackerel simultaneously on a sabiki rig. The combined fight offered by the fish was substantial and she initially thought that she had become snagged on a bed of seaweed.

Mackerel are possibly the ultimate fun fish of the northwestern Atlantic. They can be easily caught from shore on inexpensive gear and a successful outing requires absolutely no skill or finesse on the part of the angler. If mackerel are present and biting, they will indiscriminately attack any bright and shiny object small enough to fit in their mouths. On a good day, these traits can make for hours of non-stop action.

Methods and gear

There are undoubtedly numerous methods for catching mackerel, but I prefer casting from secluded sections of shoreline rather than jigging from piers and floats as such convenient and comfortable structures tend to be a bit crowded.

A medium weight freshwater spinning rod/reel combo loaded with 12 to 14 pound monofilament line is all that is needed for mackerel fishing. A light or ultra light setup will also work in a pinch, but may not have the strength needed to contend with waves, currents, and frequent snags on rocks and seaweed.

For a rig, I prefer a sabiki or similar multi-hook rig attached to a 1 to 2-ounce casting or trolling sinker. The line from the reel attaches to the barrel swivel at the top of the rig and the sinker attaches to the snap swivel at the bottom of the rig. Some anglers employ a mackerel jig in lieu of a plain sinker, but my experience has been that such jigs greatly increase the likelihood of a snag.

Above: A sabiki rig attached to a 2-ounce trolling sinker, ready to catch some fish.

To fish, simply cast and then retrieve the retrieve the rig at a moderate pace. Nothing more complicated is required. If mackerel are around and hungry, they’ll bite.

A note on mackerel as table fare

Mackerel have an unfair reputation as an excessively strong tasting and oily fish. While the meat is darker and stronger than flounder or haddock, it is not nearly as strong as tuna, swordfish, or even salmon.

As with all fish, the key to optimizing flavor is care and preparation. I immediately place any fish I catch into an ice filled cooler. Fish that are left in the summer heat will undoubtedly soften and begin to spoil before the end of the fishing trip. Additionally, I like to clean my catch before leaving the water, making sure to remove the gills, which begin to spoil quickly. Mackerel can be left whole for cooking, but I absolutely hate having fish bones wedge themselves between my teeth, so I put in the extra effort required to produce boneless fillets.

Since mackerel are a naturally flavorful fish, light and simple seasoning is all that is required. Salt, pepper, and garlic or alternatively a light soy sauce or teriyaki-based marinade is a good choice of seasoning. Grilling and broiling are the best cooking methods for mackerel and care should be taken not to overcook and dry out the fillets. The finished product will be good hot or cold when paired with a fresh garden salad. (24)

In a recent article I wrote about the capabilities of a short barreled, home defense or utility shotgun as a close range bird gun. In addition to yielding useful patterns out to about 25 yards at the range, my own utility gun, a Benelli Nova Tactical, was instrumental in the taking of two ruffed grouse from the thick Maine woods.

While two birds for the grill is evidence enough that a utility shotgun is a capable bird gun, I was curious about the practical limits of my current favorite birdshot load (2-3/4-inch Remington Express loads pushing 1-1/4 ounces of size 7.5 shot) in terms of terminal performance. To find out, I cast some ballistic gelatin into blocks approximately the size of a grouse’s kill zone and shot one at 10 yards, one at 25, and one at 35. All shots were taken with a Benelli Nova Tactical with an 18.5-inch barrel sporting a fixed, improved cylinder choke.

 10 Yards

At ten yards, due to shooter error, the center of the pellet storm missed the block. Still, approximately half of the cloud struck the block and many cleared the entire 3.5-inches of gelatin. I was able to recover 22 pellets total and additional pellets likely exited the block completely. Clearly, a hit at ten yards will result in a dead bird and a direct, dead center hit will likely ruin a substantial amount of meat.

Above: The gelatin block after being struck at ten yards with a 1-1/4 ounce load of of size 7.5 shot.

25 yards

Penetration was slightly diminished at 25 yards and naturally, lower pattern density at that range meant fewer pellets hit the block. The 11 pellets I was able to recover penetrated between two and three inches of gelatin. I’m confident that the Remington Express load would reliably kill small game at this distance out of an open choked gun, but it does seem like 25 yards is the ethical, maximum range for the gun/load combo with the sweet spot being distances of 10 to 20 yards.

35 yards

Performance was iffy at best at 35 yards. A mere five pellets struck the block and they only penetrated to a depth of about two-inches. Would a small game animal hit with the gun/load combo at such a distance be killed instantly? Possibly, but it seems just as likely that the animal would escape with an ultimately fatal wound and become food for the crows and blue jays.

Above: A gel block after absorbing a few birdshot pellets at 35 yards.

Conclusion

When using smaller shot sizes I will try to keep shots on grouse-sized game to less than 25 yards. Under most hunting conditions I’m likely to encounter, this is more effective range than I need. That being said, ruffed grouse do often venture onto abandoned logging roads to obtain crop stones and sun themselves. Such birds can be spotted at distances well beyond 35 yards. In such situations, a larger shot size may offer more penetration at longer distances. However, switching to larger shot means fewer pellets per shell, thus decreasing the changes of a hit. (22)

During a recent stint as an employee at a local gun shop, one of the discussions that began amongst my coworkers during a rare slow day was how well a home defense optimized shotgun would work as an upland game gun. Would the short barrel and fixed choke typically characteristic of such guns be an asset or a handicap while in pursuit of ruffed grouse and snowshoe hare in the dense woods of rural Maine? Being the investigative type, I took it upon myself to find out.

Tactical = durability and utility

When the term “bird gun” is uttered, images of fine, walnut stocked side by side and over/under shotguns likely come to mind. Such scatterguns have been ubiquitous among small game hunters since the days when black powder, muzzle loading, double guns were the pinnacle of shotgun technology.

While I am undoubtedly fond of such elegant firearms and would jump at the chance to own a $10,000+ over/under, there are small game hunting scenarios in which the $400 home defense gun may be the better option. Consider, for instance the photo below of a section of eastern Maine woods.

In many respects, terms such as “woods” or “forest” are an incorrect label for such terrain and “impenetrable wall of flora” is far more honest terminology. A hunter does not walk through such terrain, he or she stumbles though it, more often than not ending a day afield covered in pine pitch and with an extensive collection of pucker brush scratches. Bringing a high dollar firearm with a fine wood stock into such an environment is akin to driving a Mercedes down a washed out dirt road at top speed.

By contrast, many of the features that allegedly make a shotgun “tactical” also make it ideal for hunting small game in thick brush. For example, the synthetic stocks of many home defense shotguns are incredibly durable and scratch resistant. Should a hunter trip and fall head first into a tangle of blackberry bushes and spruce saplings, the gun will be no worse for wear. Additionally, the short barrels found on tactical shotguns significantly reduce overall length thus improving maneuverability in the thick stuff.

The greatest potential limitation of a home defense shotgun in a small game hunting role has to do with the choke. Such guns usually come with a fixed choke (typically cylinder or improved cylinder) that allows a shot column to open up fairly rapidly. While at close range an open choke may improve a hunter’s chance of hitting a fast moving target, it may prove to be somewhat of a handicap in terrain that allows shots to be made at a variety of distances.

 Pattern tests

Prior to fielding my own home defense shotgun – a 12-gauge Benelli Nova Tactical with an 18.5-inch barrel and a fixed improved cylinder choke – I took to the range to pattern test the gun with a small selection of birdshot loads. Tested loads included a 2-3/4-inch handload sporting 1-ounce of size 7.5 shot, the 2-3/4-inch Remington Express load with a 1-1/4-ounce payload of size 7.5 shot, and a 3-inch Federal Black Cloud load of 1-1/4 ounces of steel size BB shot.

The targets used in the pattern test consisted of 14×22-inch sheets of poster board with a 6-inch Shoot ‘N ‘C target at the center. The 6-inch central target was roughly the size of the kill zone of many upland game birds meaning that multiple pellet strikes within that circle would likely translate to a dead bird in the woods. The results of the pattern tests follow.

Test 1: Handloaded 1-ounce, size 7.5 shot and Remington 1-1/4-ounce Express size 7.5 shot at 10 yards

While a range of ten yards may seem unreasonably close, I have taken numerous ruffed grouse and more than a few rabbits at distances that were even closer. In fact, I have hunted areas where the woods are so thick that quarry more than 15 yards from a hunter is relatively safe from any common birdshot load.

As I expected, at ten yards the six-inch Shoot ‘n C targets were thoroughly peppered by both the 1-ounce and 1-1/4-ounce loads. At this distance, a direct hit on a bird or rabbit has the potential to result in an unacceptable amount of ruined meat.

Above: The ten yard patterns produced by the Remington Express load (left) and the 1-ounce handload (right).

Test 2: Handloaded 1-ounce, size 7.5 shot and Remington 1-1/4-ounce Express size 7.5 shot at 25 yards

At 25 yards, the pattern produced by my Nova became noticeably less dense. Even so, both tested loads planted multiple pellets in the 6-inch central target and would likely reliably take small game in the 20 to 25 yard range. Thirteen pellets from the 1-ounce handload landed in the kill zone and 20 pellets from the Remington Express load struck the central target.

Pellet coverage of the 14×22-inch poster board was fairly even for the Remington load while there were substantial gaps in the overall pattern generated by the 1-ounce handload. At longer distances, a heavier payload weight and higher pellet count seems to be an asset when working with an improved cylinder choke.

Above: The 25 yard patterns produced by the Remington Express load (left) and the 1-ounce handload (right).

Test 3: Handloaded 1-ounce, size 7.5 shot and Remington 1-1/4-ounce Express size 7.5 shot at 35 yards

While both the 1 ounce load and the 1-1/4-ounce Remington load put pellets on the central target at 35 yards, there were large gaps in the overall pattern large through which smaller game animals could easily slip. Ten pellets from the 1-ounce load landed in the central target and 9 from the Remington Express round landed in the center circle. While both loads are clearly capable of taking game at 35 yards, scoring a hit at that distance may require a certain degree of luck.

Above: The 35 yard patterns produced by the Remington Express load (left) and the 1-ounce handload (right).

Test 4: Federal Black Cloud, 1-1/4-ounce load of Steel size BB shot at 25 and 35 yards

The Federal Black Cloud waterfowl load incorporates a relatively recent innovation called the Flitecontrol wad. The Flitecontrol wad is a stiff, plastic shot cup that incorporates a series of integral air brakes designed to decelerate the wad in a way that allows a payload of shot to deploy in a more controlled manner than a conventional wad. The desired result is a tighter pattern regardless of the type of choke used.

Above: A federal Flitecontrol wad recovered after firing.

I was interested to find out how the Flitecontrol loads would pattern out of my Nova, so I set targets at 25 and 35 yards and let fly with a couple of rounds. In spite of the low pellet count inherent to large shot sizes, the Black Cloud load fared quite well with 11 pellets striking the central target at 25 yards and six pellets striking the center at 35 yards. With a smaller shot size in a Flitecontrol wad, an open choked, short barreled shotgun could potentially be an effective medium-range turkey gun.

Above the 25 yard pattern (left) and 35 yard pattern (right) yielded by the Federal Flitecontrol load.

Hunting

With my range work complete, I set out into the nearby woods in hopes of finding out how the Nova would perform under actual hunting conditions. I was in luck during my outing as the ruffed grouse (known in northern New England as partridge) were out in droves. As usual, I did my fair share of missing but not due to any fault of the gun. In one instance I pulled the trigger just as a flying bird dodged into a stand of spruce saplings and in another instance I fired just as a running bird ducked into a bowl-like depression in the ground.

Later in the day, however, my reflexes and aim improved and I managed to bag two birds. One I took neatly at a range of approximately 20 yards as it wandered along the edge of a clear cut and another I knocked out of the air as it flew across the abandoned logging road I was walking.

As I expected, the Nova’s short overall length made maneuvering through the thickest stands of pines and poplar saplings as easy as such a task can be. Additionally, the gun’s ghost ring sights lined up quickly on walking and running birds, but were easy enough to ignore while attempting to lead flying birds.

While a short, open choked, home defense shotgun wouldn’t be my first choice for hunting fast and high flying waterfowl or pheasants in a corn field, when the woods are thick and brutal, a gun that’s short and rugged may just be what is required.

Above: Two delicious ruffed grouse were taken by the author using his Benelli Nova Tactical loaded with Remington Express, size 7.5 loads.

(24)